A graph can be considered a collection of paths of the form node, predicate arc, node, predicate arc, node, predicate arc, ... node which cover the entire graph. In RDF/XML these turn into sequences of elements inside elements which alternate between elements for nodes and predicate arcs. This has been called a series of node/arc stripes. The node at the start of the sequence turns into the outermost element, the next predicate arc turns into a child element, and so on. The stripes generally start at the top of an RDF/XML document and always begin with nodes.
The RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax [RDF-CONCEPTS] defines the RDF Graph data model (Section 3.1) and the RDF Graph abstract syntax (Section 6). Along with the RDF Semantics [RDF-SEMANTICS] this provides an abstract syntax with a formal semantics for it. The RDF graph has nodes and labeled directed arcs that link pairs of nodes and this is represented as a set of RDF triples where each triple contains a subject node, predicate and object node. Nodes are RDF URI references, RDF literals or are blank nodes. Blank nodes may be given a document-local, non-RDF URI references identifier called a blank node identifier. Predicates are RDF URI references and can be interpreted as either a relationship between the two nodes or as defining an attribute value (object node) for some subject node.
Thank you for a great piece.
I have a question about the positional encoding. Here you seem to interleave sine and cosine curves over the dimensions for a given position. The indexing in the original paper suggests the same, but the code at https://github.com/tensorfl... (and the discussion at http://jalammar.github.io/i... ) suggests a concatenation of sines on the left and cosines on the right.
I'm not sure it makes a substantive difference, but would you agree there's a difference in implementation here?
Return to School Today.
More information about what we collect and how we share your personal information is available in our Privacy Policy.